Share

In this Issue

Minimize or Maximize
NAICS Newsletter November 7, 2013

NAICS 541513

Computer Facilities Management Services

Government Contract and Procurement Analysis Report

Report Summary

This report, offered by epipeline, contains a brief analysis of the Federal government's procurement practices with regards to purchasing Computer Facilities Management Services.


You will find information on the top federal government agencies that purchase these services, as well as their procurement strategy (i.e. full and open competition, set-asides and more). Finally, there is a review of the top companies that are awarded federal government contracts for Computer Facilities Management Services.


To get a more comprehensive analysis and learn more about how epipeline can help you identify current and future bid opportunities, register for a live Demo.

This report takes an in-depth look at the 'Computer Facilities Management Services' industry, NAICS 541513. epipeline's Contract History Plus* provides you with a broad context and several perspectives that enable you to develop the best positioning and strategy for your company to more effectively compete for government contracts. The following graph illustrates one such perspective: the top Government departments/agencies buying these services over the last four fiscal years.

Top 10 Federal Agencies by % of Total Market FY10 through FY14 for NAICS 541513

WHAT IS NAICS 541513?

This U.S. industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in providing on-site management and operation of clients' computer systems and/or data processing facilities. Establishments providing computer systems or data processing facilities support services are included in this industry.

The description of NAICS 541513 is further broken out to include these additional specific topics:

  • Computer systems facilities (i.e., clients' facilities) management and operation
  • Data processing facilities (i.e., clients' facilities) management and operations
  • Facilities (i.e., clients' facilities) management and operation services, compute
  • Facilities (i.e., clients' facilities) support services, computer systems or data

The size standard associated with NAICS 541513 is $25.5 million (effective January 1, 2012), which means that a company, including its affiliates, would be considered a "small business" if their average earnings do not exceed $25.5 million for each of the pay periods for the preceding completed 12 calendar months.

Total reported spending under NAICS 541513 for the period of Fiscal Year 2010 (FY10) through Fiscal Year 2014 (FY14) was $13.6 billion. FY14 reported spending is $21 million for services under NAICS 541513. The chart below illustrates the reported** spending by year for FY10 through FY14.

Reported Contract Spending for NAICS 541513 FY10 through FY14

Source: epipeline's Contract History Plus*

WHO ISSUES THE CONTRACTS?

The Office of Procurement Operations was the largest procurer for these services for the last five fiscal years (FY10 through FY14) with $1.7 billion in contract spending, comprising 12.5% of market share for NAICS 541513. The Army reported over $1.3 billion in contract dollars, while the State Department took the third spot with $908 million. The top ten agencies all reported over $500 million, with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ($784 million), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ($749 million), NASA ($674 million), TSA ($621 million), U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement ($530 million), FDA ($525 million), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection ($519 million) each reporting between 3.8% and 5.8% market share. Overall, the top ten agencies represented 61.4% of the market.

Top 10 Federal Agencies by % of Total Market FY10 through FY14 for NAICS 541513

Source: epipeline's Contract History Plus*

WHO WINS THE CONTRACTS?

The two charts below identify the top 10 Companies, by market share, for the period of FY10 through FY14. The first chart represents the top 10 companies that were awarded their contracts under ANY type of competition, whether it was full and open, small business set-aside, sole-sourced, etc. This list primarily consists of large businesses. The second chart, however, lists the top 10 companies that won their contracts under RESTRICTED competition. Specifically, epipeline limited this to those contracts awarded under the acquisition strategies listed below. The contract dollars represented on this second chart may not include all contract dollars for the individual contractor.

  • 8(a) Competed
  • 8(a) Small Disadvantaged (SDB) set-aside
  • 8(a) sole-source
  • SDB set-aside
  • SDB, 8(a) with HUBZone
  • Combination HUBZone and 8(a)
  • HUBZone set-aside
  • HUBZone sole-source
  • Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) set-aside
  • SDVOSB sole-source
  • Emerging Small Business set-aside
  • Very Small Business set-aside
  • Reserved for Small Businesses ($2501 to $100,000)
  • Total Small Business set-aside

Computer Sciences Corporation achieved the top spot on the unrestricted competition list with $1.8 million in contract dollars for FY10 to FY14 and 14.3% market share. SAIC ($1.1 billion), Electronic Data Systems Corporation ($910 million), Lockheed Martin ($794 million) came in second, third, and fourth with 9.1%, 7.3%, and 6.4% market share, respectively. Stanley Associates ($555 million), Perot Systems Government Services, ($528 million), and CSC Systems and Solutions ($515 million) each reported between 4.1% and 4.4% market share. All firms in the top ten, including the last three, General Dynamics One Source ($491 million), ActioNet ($395 million), and Companion Data Services ($330 million), all earned over $300 million. Together, the top ten companies comprised over half (59.4%) of the market.

PLEASE NOTE: as this is a listing by Company name, rather than PARENT company, some companies may have more than one ranking, which may not be reflected in the chart below.

Top 10 NAICS 541513 Contractors by % of Total Market for FY10 through FY14 - All Acquisition Strategies

Source: epipeline's Contract History Plus*

The combined contract spending for contracts awarded under "restricted competition," as outlined above, totaled $2.2 billion for FY10 through FY14. ActioNet, who also reported the ninth highest amount of unrestricted contract dollars, took the largest percentage of the restricted market with 10.3%, or $228 million. DB Consulting Group ($122 million) and Information Innovators ($110 million) also reported over $100 million in contract dollars. CNI Information Technology ($98 million), Evolver ($92 million), INDUS Corporation ($85 million), Primus Solutions ($63 million), and Altech Services ($59 million) all reported over $50 million. The remaining two companies in the top ten, Maricom Systems ($48 million) and Caelum Research Corporation ($48 million), both earned 2.2% market share.

PLEASE NOTE: as this is a listing by Company name, rather than PARENT company, some companies may have more than one ranking, which may not reflected in the chart below.

Top 10 NAICS 541513 Contractors by % of Total Market for FY10 through FY14 - Restricted Competition

Source: epipeline's Contract History Plus*

HOW ARE THESE CONTRACTS PROCURED?

80.1% of contract spending reported for the FY10 through FY14 timeframe under NAICS 541513 used full and open (unrestricted aka "N/A") competition. This equated to $11 billion in contract dollars. Contracts set aside for small businesses comprised the second largest sector with 5.9% of the market and $801 million in spending. Unrestricted 8(a) acquisitions accounted for 5.8% of the market and $788 million in spending, while procurements sole sourced to 8(a) vendors accounted for 5% of the market and $671 million in contract dollars. $30 million in contract dollars (.96% of market share) did not include a designated acquisition strategy.

Acquisition Breakout under NAICS 541513 for FY10 through FY14

Source: epipeline's Contract History Plus*

WHERE ARE THESE CONTRACTS PERFORMED?

These contracts are being performed across the United States with a reported spending for the FY10 through FY14 period of $2.8 billion.

The state with the highest total of reported contract spending was Virginia with $4.3 billion, or 31.8% market share. Washington, DC and Maryland also reported over $1 billion in contract dollars with $3.3 billion and $1.4 billion, while Mississippi and Texas took the fourth and fifth spots, reporting $884 million and $593 million. To round out the top ten, Oklahoma ($315 million), Alabama ($300 million), California ($267 million), South Carolina ( $243 million), and Pennsylvania ($118 million) each reported over $100 million in spending. Together, the top 10 states represent 86% of the market.

Contract Place of Performance under NAICS 541513 for FY10 through January 2011

Source: epipeline's Contract History Plus*

Related Articles:
Identify, Qualify & Win More Government Contracts for All Other Misc Waste Mgmt Svcs

Get a live demo to see how you can:

  • Build a government lead pipeline from current and future bid opportunities
  • Qualify leads with invaluable market intelligence
  • Access procurement history to better understand government agency needs
  • Win federal, state and local bids from government agencies
  • Gain a competitive advantage
Get a live demo Separator

"epipeline’s sales, support, and research staff have been incredibly responsive and professional. Easy to use tracking and management tools elevate their product in a crowded field. The Contract History and Market Intelligence functions have increased my ability to analyze our competitors and target opportunities that will provide a greater PWin. "

Ahsha Miranda
C-Port Marine Services, LLC

Separator

epipeline is part of Government Contracts USA, offering a range of services in government contracts, government RFPs, government bids and government procurement systems.

Federal Contracting: epipeline & You epipeline's proprietary research, enables you to effectively identify, qualify, distribute, and manage opportunities at an earlier stage, reducing your costs and providing a competitive advantage.

Email Facebook Linkedin Twitter